What the data shows
"boat"Jev: "line"- 40% agreement overall. Where people agree strongly (the most predictable quarter), Jev picks their word 56% of the time; where people scatter, 16%.
- As spread out as people, on average: Jev puts 33% of its weight on people's top word; people give it 31%. It doesn't simply go for the obvious answer.
- It almost never goes off the list: "some other word" gets 3% from Jev; 32% of people's answers weren't among the seven.
- Its biggest surprises: "row" → "line" (people: "boat", 74%); "top" → "above" (people: "bottom", 70%); "noun" → "thing" (people: "verb", 69%). In these, people jump to an opposite or a companion word; Jev picks a related sense.
What it means, and what it doesn't
Jev's associations overlap with people's but aren't the crowd's: it matches their top word four times in ten, and in its biggest misses it reaches for a related sense ("top" → "above") where people reach for the opposite or the pair ("top" → "bottom"). That would fit a model that learned words from the sentences around them rather than from the quick pairings of human memory, though three examples are a hint, not a pattern.
It chose from a list rather than producing a word, and the students are one group at one time, so treat the numbers as a comparison with this crowd, not with everyone.