What the data shows

- Headline nutrients are near perfect: calories 99%, fat 98%, protein 97%, fiber 95%.
- Micronutrients are shakier: vitamin C 88%, calcium 88%, cholesterol 89%, potassium 89%. Raw garlic versus jarred salsa is typical: Jev picks the salsa, whose vitamin C is actually lower.
- Animals: litter size 97%, gestation and lifespan 93% and 92%, but incubation only 84%.
- Not a food-group stereotype: between foods from different groups, it's right 93% when the answer is the group usually richer in that nutrient, and 94% when it isn't. So it isn't just guessing "fruit has vitamin C".
What it means, and what it doesn't
Jev knows the numbers people talk about (calories, protein) much better than the ones they don't (minerals, incubation times). Even on easy comparisons, about one in eight answers about vitamin C or calcium is wrong. That matters for anyone asking a model nutrition questions.
These are comparisons, not exact values. Being right 88% of the time on "which has more" says nothing about how close its estimate of the actual amount would be.